At least the pandemic had a silver lining.
It taught parents that there are better alternatives to government schools.
When COVID hit, bureaucrats in control were eager to close schools. Many closed them if just one child tested positive, even though COVID is little threat to kids.
Union teachers seemed eager to be paid not to work. Los Angeles teachers secured a contract that said they will “not be required to teach classes using live video conferencing,” and won’t be required to “provide instruction more than four hours a day.” Nice work if you can get it.
More than a million parents chose to leave the government system. They spent their own money to educate their children in private and religious schools.
Others tried home schooling.
Many had been skeptical but now discovered that their kids learned more, and their family life was enriched by teaching at home. The education establishment sneers at home schooling, but home-schooled students, even though they are more likely to be poor, score 30% higher on SAT tests. They also do better in college, and they are less likely to drink or do drugs.
Finally, even within government systems, school choice grew.
Kansas and Missouri expanded access to charter schools.
Georgia, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Iowa, South Dakota, Utah and Tennessee expanded Education Savings Accounts, which help parents try private schools.
Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey signed “the most expansive school choice legislation in the nation.” It gives money to families that families can spend on private school, home schooling, micro schools, tutoring or any other educational service that meets the needs of kids. Any kid can qualify. The state simply gives the family what they would have spent in the public school (up to $7,000). That’s much more generous and simpler than other states choice plans.
In San Francisco, voters recalled three school board members. Apparently voters did not like that they kept public schools closed and, instead of figuring out how to reopen, obsessed over renaming schools called Washington or Lincoln.
In Virginia, voters rejected governor Terry McAuliffe after he said, “I don’t think parents should be telling schools what they should teach.” His opponent, Glenn Youngkin said, “Parents should be in charge of their kids’ education.” Youngkin won.
“For far too long in K-12 education, the only special interest group has been the teachers unions,” wrote the Reason Foundation’s Corey DeAngelis in The Wall Street Journal. “Now, there’s a new interest group — parents. They are never going to unsee what they saw in 2020 and 2021, and they’re going to fight to make sure they never feel powerless when it comes to their children’s education again.”
Of course, union leaders hate the choice movement. American Federation of Teachers president Randi Weingarten calls it racist. “The real ‘pioneers’ of private school choice were the white politicians who resisted school integration,” she wrote. Today’s choice programs are “polite cousins of segregation.”
But that’s nonsense.
“Don’t tell me school choice is racist!” says Denisha Merriweather, founder of the new group Black Minds Matter. “(Choice opponents) are implying that parents, especially lower-income, black parents, should stay trapped in public schools that have failed their children for decades … We need a new system … empowered by parents.”
School choice increases diversity, adds Liv Finne of the Washington Policy Center’s Center for Education. “Modern-day school vouchers lead to more ethnic and racial integration in the schools, not less.”
One poll showed that 74% of African Americans and 71% of Latinos support school choice.
Choice opponents are mostly unions, establishment Democrats and frightened suburban Republicans.
But now lots of innovation has begun.
One example: Stop Foundation 4 Education gives awards to educational innovators. Its $10 million will go to nonprofits, entrepreneurs and community organizations that provide more educational options. Recipients include Rock by Rock, an education software company, and STEMuli, a game-based learning company.
School choice is good for everybody but unions, socialist bureaucrats and the tired education establishment.
It’s one good thing accidentally created by the pandemic.
Photo by Max Fischer
De-regulate and privatize education, but don’t stop there. Anything government does, the private sector can do better.
100% behind giving parents more options from which to choose. Do stop calling it school choice. @BetsyDeVos calls it #EducationFreedom.
We believe accuracy requires that it is called #ParentsChoice
#ParentsChoiceIsSchoolChoice
#parentslove –> #parentsdecide
I am infuriated that taxpayers had to pay top dollar for a government service that is so poorly delivered that parents untrained in teaching do a much better job than the professionals. Mind, the parents still pay for that public school education regardless of whether they do all the work themselves.
The United States has by far the most expensive (on a per-capita basis) and least effective health care system among first world countries. I say least effective because we have the lowest life expectancy and the highest infant mortality rate among first world countries. This is because we have the for-profit system that is designed to maximize shareholder value by squeezing as much money out of us as possible. It is not designed for public health. Health care costs have been going up faster than inflation for decades. Where are the things like competition and innovation that are supposed to be making things better?
Same thing in the for-profit pharmaceutical industry.
I don’t want an educational system that is designed to squeeze as much money out of us as possible and not for public education. That’s what we would get by privatizing education.
The idea that “Anything government does, the private sector can do better” has long been promoted by those who want to squeeze as much money out of us as they can.
Seems to me that it’s the greedy government trying to squeeze as much money as it can out of us. Why on earth does it need 5 trillion of our money year over year and ever increasing?